MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296636181 · doi:10.1093/jas/skac247.155

171 Sex-Sorted Sperm Used for Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination and in Vitro Fertilization in Wood Bison

2022· article· en· W4296636181 on OpenAlexaffabout
E. M. Zwiefelhofer, M. L. Zwiefelhofer, Paula M. Mackie, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsToronto ZooUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexingSpermHuman fertilizationArtificial inseminationInseminationIn vitro fertilisationBison bisonBiologyAndrologyAnimal scienceHerdPregnancySemenGynecologyMedicineEcologyZoologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) are a threatened species native to Canada. In a conservation setting such as zoos, females are preferred over males and sex-sorted sperm may help skew the proportion of females born. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of sex-sorted sperm in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI, Experiment 1) and in vitro fertilization (IVF, Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, females in bison herds at the University of Saskatchewan and Toronto Zoo were synchronized with 3.3 mg estradiol-17ß + 50 mg progesterone and given a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device for 8 days. At device removal, bison were given 500 µg of cloprostenol, and 72 h later were given 2500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and inseminated with either sex-sorted or conventional sperm. A second insemination occurred 24 h after hCG. Pregnancy diagnosis and fetal sexing was done by transrectal ultrasonography at 30- and 70-days post-AI, respectively. In Experiment 2, cumulus oocyte complexes collected transvaginally from live bison were fertilized in vitro with either sex-sorted or conventional sperm. Cleavage and embryo rates were determined at 3- and 7-days post fertilization, respectively. Proportional data were compared by chi-square. In Experiment 1, there was no effect of herd (P=0.17) or sperm (P=0.68) on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 30 days (total=25/51 [49%]). The proportion of female calves was greater in the sex-sorted than conventional group (9/10 [90%] vs 3/11 [27%]; P< 0.01). In Experiment 2, the cleavage (122/222 [55%] vs 62/94 [66%];P=0.07) and embryo rate (18/222 [8%] vs 14/94 [15%]; P=0.07) tended to be lower in the sex-sorted than the conventional group. In summary, sex-sorted sperm increased the proportion of female bison calves born following FTAI. Future efforts will include improving embryo production rates following IVF with sex-sorted sperm. Funding provided by Toronto Zoo, Mitacs, and STGenetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207