Fluid Charging and Paleo‐pressure Evolution in the Ledong Slope Zone of the Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Large numbers of gas reservoirs have been discovered in overpressure basins. Fluid charging has a close relationship with paleo‐pressure evolution, affecting the migration of gas reservoirs. To study fluid charging and the related pressure system, we analyzed burial histories and fluid inclusion (PVTx) simulations and conducted basin modeling of the Ledong Slope Zone in the Yinggehai Basin as an example. On the basis of fluid‐inclusion assemblages (FIAs), homogenization temperature (Th), final melting temperature (Tm, ice) and Raman spectroscopy in fluid inclusions, there are three stages of fluid charging: during the first and second stage, methane‐dominated fluid was charged at 2.2–1.7 Ma and 1.7–0.9 Ma, respectively. In the third stage, CO2‐rich hydrothermal fluid was charged since 0.9 Ma. It could be concluded from the well‐logging data that the disequilibrium compaction in the Yinggehai Fm., along with the fluid expansion and clay diagenesis in the Huangliu and Meishan formations, resulted in the overpressure in the Ledong slope zone. The evolution of paleo‐pressure was affected by the sedimentation rate of the Yinggehai Fm., as well as the hydrocarbon generation rate. Additionally, the Ledong Slope Zone is less affected by diapir activity than the nearby diapir area. Based on fluid inclusions, paleo‐pressure, basin modeling and geological background, the gas migration history of the Ledong Slope Zone can be divided into four stages: in the first stage, excess pressure was formed around 5 Ma; from 2.2 to 1.7 Ma, there was a reduction in the charging of hydrocarbon fluid and steadily increasing excess pressure; during the 1.7–0.9 Ma period a large amount of hydrocarbon was generated, excess pressure increasing significantly and hydraulic fractures forming in mudstones, With gas reservoirs developing in structural highs; since 0.9 Ma, CO2‐rich hydrothermal fluid accumulated in reservoirs adjacent to faults and the pressure coefficient remained stable. The research results are helpful in the study of fluid migration and accumulation mechanisms in overpressure basins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".