Geological History of Nott Corona, Isabella Quadrangle (V-50), Venus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nott Corona is within Isabella Quadrangle (V-50), located 3000 km south of Atla Regio, east of Aditi Dorsa, southwest of Wawalag Planitia, and north of Nsomeka Planitia. Nott Corona has a central depression with dimensions of 110 x 80 km and a depth of about 250 m. Nott Corona has been described in the initial reconnaissance mapping of Quadrangle V-50 (e.g., [1-2]), and briefly discussed in [3]. Isabella (175 km diameter) is the second-largest impact crater on Venus and has been previously characterized in detail [4]. The region has abundant magmatic features in addition to Nott Corona: Epon Corona, Libby Patera, Tursa Tholus, as well as graben-fissure systems. We have selected the Nott corona region for detailed (1:500,000 scale) geological mapping to produce a geological history that integrates the volcanic features (lava flows and magmatic centres) along with graben fissure systems interpreted to overlie dyke swarms (c.f. [5]). The focus of this abstract is our detailed mapping of the radiating graben-fissure systems in the region, and grouping of these into different swarms. Our mapping reveals the impressive radiating swarm associated with Nott corona and additional centres, and also circumferential swarms associated with Libby Patera and Epona corona, as well as additional linear swarms whose source is not yet identified, but could belong to giant radiating swarms fed from distal magmatic centres outside the study area. Future mapping in this area will focus on detailed mapping (1:500,000 scale) of the flows to determine their history and identify their magmatic sources, whether fissure-fed from dykes (circumferential or radial) or fed from inferred small magma chambers marked by surface collapse features [6], or fed from circular fractures associated with caldera collapse [6, 7]. References: [1] Bleamaster L.F. (2006) 37th LPSC, Abstract # 2233. [2] Bleamaster L.F. (2008) Abstr. Ann. Mtg. Planet. Geol. Mappers. [3] Basilevsky A.T., et al. (2009) 40th LPSC, Abstract # 1827. [4] Miyamoto H., Sasaki, S. (2000) Icarus, 145, 533-545. [5] Buchan K.L. and Ernst R.E. (2021). Gond. Res., 100, 25-43. [6] MacLellan L.M., et al. (2021). Earth-Sci. Rev., 220. 103619. [7] El Bilali H., et al. (2021). 52nd LPSC, Abstract No. 2529.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".