On the discovery of the main belt source of the enstatite chondrites.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Linking a meteorite type to a specific parent asteroid allows us to gain insight into the composition of the latter as well as the time, and indirectly the heliocentric distance of its formation. Up to now there have been established solid links between the HEDs and the inner main belt asteroid family of (4) Vesta [1] as well as between the ordinary chondrites and asteroids belonging to the so-called spectroscopic S-complex [2]. Here we report on our search for the enstatite chondrites parent body. We base our analysis on two facts: that (i) inner main belt asteroid collisional families are the most favoured to deliver meteorites to Earth, and (ii) enstatite chondrites (divided in EH and EL groups) have reflectance spectra that are within the broad asteroid spectroscopic X-complex [3]. The newly discovered asteroid families of Athor and Zita [4] are the only two families of the inner main belt that belong to the spectroscopic X-complex and thus are promising candidates. Methods and Results: In order to investigate the potential link between the enstatite chondrite meteorites and the aforementioned X-complex asteroid families, we performed near-infrared observations of a statistically significant number of members of Athor and Zita. These were combined with the visible data from the literature and finally each asteroid spectrum was classified using the most common asteroid spectral taxonomy. We showed that the Athor and Zita families are spectroscopically distinct from each other and homogenous among their respective members. Moreover, both families have distinct geometric albedo values, with Athor family being brighter. Focusing on the Athor family, we performed curve matching and absolute reflectance comparison with all the available laboratory meteorite spectra in NASA Reflectance Experiment Laboratory and Planetary Spectrophotometer Facility databases. We will report on our matching and provide a number of further evidence that inner main belt families could indeed deliver enstatite chondrites to Earth. Acknowledgments: We acknowledge support from the ANR ORIGINS (ANR-18-CE31-13-0014). CA was supported by the project “Investissements d’Avenir” UCA-JEDI (ANR-15-IDEX-01) and the European Space Agency, AM acknowledges support from the ERC advanced grant HolyEarth N. 101019380. KJW acknowledges support from the Project ESPRESSO, a NASA SSERVI program at SwRI. This work is based on data provided by the Minor Planet Physical Properties Catalogue (MP3C, mp3c.oca.eu) of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur. This research utilises spectra acquired at the NASA RELAB facility at Brown University and at Planetary Spectrophotometer Facility (PSF) at University of Winnipeg. References: [1] Russell C.T. et al. 2012, Science 336, 6082, 684. [2] Reddy V. et al. 2015, Asteroids IV, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 895, 43-63 [3] Vernazza P. et al. 2009. Icarus 202, 2, 477-486. [4] Delbo M. et al. 2019. Astronomy & Astrophysics 624, A69.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".