MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296849612 · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000003282

Reconstruction of Quadriceps Function Using a Single Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer With an Adductor Longus Nerve to Femoral Nerve Branch of the Rectus Femoris Nerve Transfer

2022· article· en· W4296849612 on OpenAlexaff
Elsa K. Donaldson, Rowan M. Chandler, Tod A. Clark, Thomas Hayakawa, Jennifer L. Giuffre

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemoral nerveObturator nerveRectus femoris muscleThighAnatomyQuadriceps femoris muscleAdductor canalAdductor musclesMotor nerveSaphenous nerveSurgeryElectromyographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: A femoral nerve injury may result in cutaneous sensory disturbances of the anteromedial thigh and complete paralysis of the quadriceps femoris muscles resulting in an inability to extend the knee. The traditional mainstay of treatment for femoral neuropathy is early physiotherapy, knee support devices, and pain control. Case reports have used the anterior division of the obturator nerve as a donor nerve to innervate the quadriceps femoris muscles; however, a second nerve transfer or nerve grafting is often required for improved outcomes. We suggest a novel technique of combining an innervated, pedicled gracilis transfer with an adductor longus to rectus femoris nerve transfer to restore the strength and stability of the quadriceps muscles. METHODS: This is a case series describing the use of a pedicled gracilis muscle transposed into the rectus femoris position with a concomitant nerve transfer from the adductor longus nerve branch into the rectus femoris nerve branch to restore quadriceps function after iatrogenic injury (hip arthroplasty) and trauma (gunshot wound). RESULTS: With electrodiagnostic confirmation of severe denervation of the quadriceps muscles and no evidence of elicitable motor units, 2 patients (average age, 47 years) underwent a quadriceps muscle reconstruction with a pedicled, innervated gracilis muscle and an adductor longus to recuts femoris nerve transfer. At 1 year follow-up, the patients achieved 4.5/5 British Medical Research Council full knee extension, a stable knee, and the ability to ambulate without an assistive aid. CONCLUSIONS: The required amount of quadriceps strength necessary to maintain quality of life has not been accurately established. In the case of femoral neuropathy, we assumed that a nerve transfer alone and a gracilis muscle transfer alone would not provide enough stability and strength to restore quadriceps function. We believe that the restoration of the quadriceps function after femoral nerve injury can be achieved by combining an innervated, pedicled gracilis transfer with an adductor longus to rectus femoris nerve transfer with low morbidity and no donor defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207