MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296897341 · doi:10.5194/epsc2022-946

Evaluation of the capability of ExoMars-TGO NOMAD infrared nadir channel for water ice clouds detection on Mars

2022· preprint· en· W4296897341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luca Ruiz Lozano, Özgür Karatekin, V. Dehant, G. Bellucci, Fabrizio Oliva, E. D’Aversa, Francesca Altieri, F. G. Carrozzo, Yannick Willame, Ian Thomas, Frank Daerden, Bojan Ristic, Manish Patel, Ann Carine Vandaele

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramNadirOccultationIce cloudInfraredAtmosphere of MarsWater vaporTrace gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery (NOMAD) is one of the four instruments on board the 2016 ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. The instrument is a suite of three spectrometers, mainly designed to study minor atmospheric species at high spectral resolution (A.C. Vandaele et al., 2015; E. Neefs et al., 2015). Nevertheless, Oliva et al. (2022) demonstrated the capability of NOMAD infrared nadir channel to investigate surface ice composition in the 2.3 – 2.6 μm wavelength range. Ice signatures have been also observed at mid/equatorial latitudes suggesting, after analysis, the first detection of CO2 ice clouds through the study of the narrow 2.35 μm absorption band. In this work, we also use observations of the NOMAD infrared LNO channel in order to evaluate its capability to detect H2O ice clouds. We present a technique taking advantage of the 2.7 µm strong ice absorption band. For this study, we select LNO spectral orders 167, 168, 169 and combine them to derive a spectral index for H2O ice detection, namely the Frost and Clouds Index (FCI). The acquisition of data during Mars Year 34 and 35 (March 2018 to February 2021) allows us to construct seasonal maps for H2O ice clouds. The results appear in agreement with previous studies focused on Mars Express SPICAM/UV and OMEGA data analysis (Willame et al., 2017; Olsen et al., 2021). FCI is sensitive to the Polar Hood clouds, although the full structure is not detected. Moreover, detections in the Aphelion Cloud Belt (ACB) are limited. This is consistent with previous OMEGA spectrometer observations (Olsen et al, 2021) showing different physical properties between the two main Martian atmospheric structures and making the ACB less detectable in the infrared. We hence derive the LNO channel sensitivity limit for these clouds detection. Acknowledgements ExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (The Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIU) and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-BI00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/V002295/1, ST/V005332/1 and ST/S00145X/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS under grant number 30442502 (ET_HOME). The IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canadian Space Agency. SR thanks BELSPO for the FED-tWIN funding (Prf-2019-077 - RT-MOLEXO). References A.C. Vandaele, et al., 2015. Optical and radiometric models of the NOMAD instrument part I: the UVIS channel. Optics Express, 23(23):30028–30042. Neefs, et al., 2015. NOMAD spectrometer on the ExoMars trace gas orbiter mission: part 1—design, manufacturing and testing of the infrared channels. Applied optics, 54(28):8494–8520. Oliva, F., et al., 2022. Martian CO2 Ice Observation at High Spectral Resolution With ExoMars/TGO NOMAD. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127, e2021JE007083. Willame, Y., et al., 2017. Retrieving cloud, dust and ozone abundances in the martian atmosphere using spicam/uv nadir spectra.Planetary and SpaceScience, 142:9–25. K.S. Olsen, et al., 2021 Retrieval of the water ice column and physical properties of water-ice clouds in the martian atmosphere using the OMEGA imaging spectrometer, Icarus, Volume 353, 2021, 113229, ISSN 0019-1035.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and Exploration→French-language works237,207→