MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296935228 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105210

Genome-wide analyses identify SCN5A as a susceptibility locus for premature atrial contraction frequency

2022· article· en· W4296935228 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Thériault, Medea Imboden, Mary L. Biggs, Thomas R. Austin, Stefanie Aeschbacher, Emmanuel Schaffner, Jennifer A. Brody, Traci M. Bartz, Martin Risch, Kirsten Grossmann, Henry J. Lin, Elsayed Z. Soliman, Wendy S. Post, Lorenz Risch, José Eduardo Krieger, Alexandre C. Pereira, Susan R. Heckbert, Nona Sotoodehnia, Nicole Probst‐Hensch, David Conen

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research InstituteUniversité Laval
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungBroad InstituteWellcome Trust
KeywordsLocus (genetics)Premature atrial contractionBiologyMedicineGeneticsComputational biologyCardiologyGeneAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature atrial contractions (PACs) are frequently observed on electrocardiograms and are associated with increased risks of atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and mortality. In this study, we aimed to identify genetic susceptibility loci for PAC frequency. We performed a genome-wide association study meta-analysis with PAC frequency obtained from ambulatory cardiac monitoring in 4,831 individuals of European ancestry. We identified a genome-wide significant locus at the SCN5A gene. The lead variant, rs7373862, located in an intron of SCN5A , was associated with an increase of 0.12 [95% CI 0.08–0.16] standard deviations of the normalized PAC frequency per risk allele. Among genetic variants previously associated with AF, there was a significant enrichment in concordance of effect for PAC frequency (n = 73/106, p = 5.1 × 10 −5 ). However, several AF risk loci, including PITX2 , were not associated with PAC frequency. These findings suggest the existence of both shared and distinct genetic mechanisms for PAC frequency and AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207