MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296999117 · doi:10.5194/epsc2022-561

Minimum Noise Fraction analysis of ExoMars/TGO-NOMAD LNO channel nadir data: SNR enhancement and application

2022· preprint· en· W4296999117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabrizio Oliva, E. D’Aversa, G. Bellucci, F. G. Carrozzo, Luca Ruiz Lozano, Özgür Karatekin, Frank Daerden, Ian Thomas, Bojan Ristic, Manish Patel, J. J. López‐Moreno, Ann Carine Vandaele, Giuseppe Sindoni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNadirOccultationHyperspectral imagingRemote sensingNoise (video)OrbiterSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)PhysicsComputer scienceGeologySatelliteOpticsArtificial intelligenceAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Nadir and Occultation for MArs Discovery (NOMAD, Neefs et al., 2015) instrument suite on board the Exomars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) spacecraft is capable to observe the Martian atmosphere at high spectral resolution with different observing modes. The data acquired in nadir observing geometry by the infrared Limb, Nadir and Occultation (LNO) channel of NOMAD are characterized by a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that is mostly limited by the instrument’s operative temperature, in turn impacting integration times. In this study we apply to LNO nadir data the Minimum Noise Fraction (MNF) technique (Green et al., 1988; Lee et al., 1990; Boardman and Kruse, 1994), usually adopted to enhance the SNR of remotely sensed hyperspectral imaging datasets (e.g. Lee et al., 1990; Amato et al, 2009; Bjorgan and Randeberg, 2015; Luo et al., 2016). In practice, the MNF projects the original data in a space in which the noise component is minimized. Such a projection is achieved by means of two consecutive Principal Component (PC) transforms (see Jolliffe and Cadima, 2016, for a comprehensive review) providing eigenvalues for the data reconstruction that are ordered with increasing noise. As first step of the analysis, we perform tests on ensembles of synthetic spectra in order to evaluate the theoretical performances of the technique in different frameworks of analysis. For example, we investigate the application of the MNF on spectral features characterized by different depth, width, correlation with other bands, and spatial dependencies, verifying that all these factors impact its effectiveness. Then, we evaluate the MNF performances on specific LNO spectral orders, in order to assess the SNR improvement for studies related to the Martian surface and aerosols/clouds (e.g. Oliva et al., 2022) and to trace gases. A limiting factor in the SNR enhancement is the presence of systematic noise linked to spectral artifacts introduced by the MNF itself. In order to remove these artifacts, the number of transform eigenvalues, and hence the noise, needs to be increased in the reconstruction of the denoised observations. Nevertheless, as result from this preliminary analysis, we report an average SNR improvement of about 20% and reaching a maximum of 50%. Acknowledgements ExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (The Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIU) and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-BI00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/V002295/1, ST/V005332/1 and ST/S00145X/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS under grant number 30442502 (ET_HOME). The IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canadian Space Agency. References Amato, U., et al., 2009. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2009, 47, 153–160. Bjorgan, A. and Randeberg, L.L., 2015. Sensors 2015, 15, 3362-3378. Boardman, J.W. and Kruse, F.A., 1994. ERIM, Ed., Proc. 10th Thematic Conference on Geological Remote Sensing, San Antonio, 407-418. Green, A.A., et al., 1988. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 65–74. Jolliffe, I.T., and Cadima, J., 2016. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374:20150202.20150202 Lee, J.B., Woodyatt, A.S. and Berman, M., 1990. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 295–304. Luo, G., et al., 2016. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42:2, 106-116. Neefs, E., et al., 2015. Appl. Opt. 54, 8494–8520. Oliva, F., et al., 2022. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127, e2021JE007083.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207