MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297021384 · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac295

CNGCs as stomatal gatekeepers during ABA signaling

2022· letter· en· W4297021384 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas A. DeFalco

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Cell · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcium (Ca2+) serves as central and ubiquitous second messenger in all eukaryotes, wherein rapid changes in free cytosolic Ca2+ levels are achieved via the coordinated action of channels, antiporters, and pumps. These changes are sensed by Ca2+ sensor proteins, which act as relays for further downstream signaling. While essentially all stimuli induce Ca2+ signals in plants, the molecular nature of relevant Ca2+-permeable channel(s) has remained stubbornly elusive in many cases. Plants lack the voltage-gated calcium channels of metazoans but do possess many nonselective, Ca2+-permeable cation channels, including those of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) family. Named for their topological similarity to mammalian CNGs, CNGCs have been implicated as Ca2+ channels in diverse pathways, though extensive genetic analysis of specific CNGCs has been hindered by suspected redundancy (Jarratt-Barnham et al., 2021). In this issue of The Plant Cell, Yan-Qiu Tan and colleagues (Tan et al., 2022) have used a combination of expression profiling and dominant-negative alleles to overcome potential genetic redundancy and thereby examine the roles of several guard cell-expressed CNGCs. Perception of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) initiates Ca2+ signaling within guard cells that ultimately results in anion efflux, loss of turgor, and stomatal closure. While the Ca2+-permeable channels that function in pathogen-triggered stomatal closure have been recently identified (Thor et al., 2020), those specifically involved in ABA-induced closure are poorly studied. The authors assayed the promoter activities of all 20 CNGC family members from Arabidopsis thaliana using both β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter lines and transcriptional analyses, which revealed five members (CNGC2, 5, 6, 9, and 12) with enriched guard cell expression. In accordance with these findings, both CNGC5 and 6 had been previously implicated in guard cell signaling (Wang et al., 2013). The authors next generated higher-order knockouts of four ofthese CNGCs as well as dominant-negative CNGC6 alleles by mutating conserved residues required for channel function. The results of this combined approach indicated that these channels likely contribute to ABA-induced stomatal closure (see Figure), as both the Ca2+ signals and control of water loss compromised in the mutants. Interestingly, the Ca2+ signals induced in guard cells by reactive oxygen species (ROS) treatment were not affected in cngc5/6/9/12 mutants, indicating that these channels act downstream of ABA-induced ROS accumulation (Tan et al., 2022). CNGC5, 6, 9, and 12 function in guard cell ABA signaling. A, CNGC guard cell expression profiles as shown by promoter-GUS reporters. B, ABA-regulated water loss compromised in cngc5/6/9/12 knockout and CNGC6 dominant-negative (CNGC6-DN1) mutants. C, ABA-induced Ca2+ currents in guard cells are disrupted in knockout (cngc5/6/9/12) and dominant-negative (DEL54) mutants. Adapted from (Tan et al., 2022), Figures 5, 7, and Supplementary Figures S1 and S5. These results underscore the complexity of CNGC function, both in guard cell/ABA signaling and beyond. In addition, the identity of the CNGC family members identified in this study suggests that genetic redundancy may not be simply determined by homology: CNGC5 and 6 are close homologs; however, CNGC9 and 12 are from distinct subfamilies (Mäser et al., 2001). Given that other putatively Ca2+-permeable channels are also found in large gene families in plants, expression profiling coupled with engineered dominant-negative genetic analyses may provide a useful approach for identifying additional channel combinations that are involved in other specific tissues, cell types, and/or biological processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant CellSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207