MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297023457 · doi:10.1002/9781119820086.ch9

Coagulation and Flocculation

2022· other· en· W4297023457 on OpenAlexaff
John C. Crittenden, R. Rhodes Trussell, BCEEM David W. Hand, Kerry J. Howe, George Tchobanoglous, Bill Ward, James H. Borchardt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlocculationCoagulationSedimentationFiltration (mathematics)Dissolved organic carbonParticulatesChemistryOrganic matterEnvironmental chemistryWater treatmentNatural organic matterChlorineEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particulate and dissolved organic matter is often identified as natural organic matter (NOM). The removal of dissolved NOM is of importance because many of the constituents that comprise dissolved NOM are precursors to the formation of disinfection by-products when chlorine is used for disinfection. The most common method used to remove particulate matter and a portion of the dissolved NOM from surface waters is by sedimentation and/or filtration following the conditioning of the water by coagulation and flocculation. This chapter presents the chemical and physical basis for the phenomena occurring in the coagulation and flocculation processes. Specific topics include the role of coagulation and flocculation processes in water treatment, stability of particles in water, coagulation theory, coagulation practice, coagulation of dissolved and organic constituents, flocculation theory, and flocculation practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207