MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297023467 · doi:10.1002/9781119820086.ch17

Reverse Osmosis

2022· other· en· W4297023467 on OpenAlexaff
John C. Crittenden, R. Rhodes Trussell, BCEEM David W. Hand, Kerry J. Howe, George Tchobanoglous, Bill Ward, James H. Borchardt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverse osmosisNanofiltrationFoulingConcentration polarizationMembraneChemistryOsmosisForward osmosisMembrane foulingPermeationMembrane technologyChemical engineeringEnvironmental chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reverse osmosis (RO) includes any pressure-driven membrane that uses preferential diffusion for separation. This chapter presents the delineation of membrane processes, applications for RO, a historical perspective, a process description, process fundamentals, and process design. RO's ability to remove virtually all contaminants in water, including many synthetic organic chemicals, has increased the interest in incorporating RO into wastewater treatment process trains as an advanced treatment process. The fundamentals of RO include the membrane material properties, the phenomenon of osmotic pressure, the mechanisms for water and solute permeation, the equations used to predict water and solute flux, and the phenomenon of concentration polarization. These topics are addressed in this chapter. Nanofiltration and RO membranes are susceptible to fouling via a variety of mechanisms. The primary sources of fouling and scaling are particulate matter, precipitation of insoluble inorganic salts, oxidation of soluble metals, and biological matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207