MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297057727 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.170415

Sensory Analysis of Pliek U Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

2022· article· en· W4297057727 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoconut Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Syiah Kuala
KeywordsAromaFood scienceMathematicsTasteFermentationFleshAnalytic hierarchy processOrganolepticSensory analysisConsistency (knowledge bases)OdorSensory systemChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The people of Aceh usually use coconut flesh to produce three derivative products, namely Pliek u oil, Simplah oil, and Pliek u oil. Pliek u is made from coconut flesh (Cocos nucifera L.) that has been fermented, dried, and oil-extracted without the addition of microbes. It has developed into a traditional recipe for cooking spices, chili sauce, and salad. Therefore, this study aims to perform sensory analysis on various forms of Pliek u based on its thickness and fermentation time using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The product was assessed for certain sensory parameters, such as color, aroma, and taste. According to the preference of the panelists for product acceptance, the sensory criteria with the highest priority weight were taste, aroma, and color at 0.550, 0.230, and 0.219, respectively. The result showed that the highest alternative weight was observed in the Pliek u with a thickness of 30 cm and a fermentation time of 7 days (K3F2) at 0.212, while a thickness of 10 cm and a fermentation time of 3 days (K1F1) were obtained the lowest alternative weight of 0.042. Also, the overall consistency value of Pliek u sensory taste was 0.02, which was acceptable since it was less than the pairwise consistency level of 0.1. According to the descriptive test, the best result was obtained by processing Pliek u at a thickness of 30 cm and a fermentation time of 7 days (K3F2), with a light brown color, no rancid odor, and a slightly sour taste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it