MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297131172 · doi:10.32782/mer.2022.95-96.06

ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF LAND RESOURCES USE

2022· article· en· W4297131172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ханлар Махмудов, Valeriia Vashchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanism of an economic regulation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArable landAgricultural landLand managementAgricultureAgrarian societyBusinessNatural resourceLand useResource (disambiguation)Productive forcesEnvironmental resource managementNatural resource economicsEconomicsEconomic systemGeographyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main components of natural resources of the agricultural enterprise is land or land resources. After conducting research and analysis of scientific publications, textbooks and manuals of scientific experts, as well as legislative and regulatory framework, the article found that there is no single definition of the essence of the concept of "land resources". On this basis, scientific approaches to the interpretation of the essence of the category "land resources" were summarized and their clarification was proposed. It was established that land resources can be interpreted as the main natural resource used in various sectors of the economy. The types of agricultural land, which include agricultural land: arable land, hayfields, pastures, fallows, perennial plantations, are substantiated. Also considered the main methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of the use of land resources of the enterprise, which allow for a comprehensive analysis, justify the conclusions about the effectiveness of agricultural land. The directions to improve the efficiency of land use by optimizing the structure of crops, the use of crop rotation, the creation of land cooperatives and improvement of the mechanism of land protection are formulated. Since the level of efficiency of agricultural land use will depend on the state of productive forces and the growth of the agrarian sector of Ukraine. Attention is paid to the issue of the concept of "land relations", which are an integral part of the economic and legal functioning of agricultural enterprises. In connection with the completion of land reform in Ukraine, the article defines the features of the regulation of land relations in the leading countries of the world. The experience of the United States of America, Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland and other countries is summarized. The peculiarities of functioning of the model of market turnover of agricultural land are analyzed, which led to the conclusion or the need to introduce a liberalized land market in Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanism of an economic regulationSame topicAgriculture Market Analysis UkraineFrench-language works237,207