MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297136859 · doi:10.54328/covm/josvas.2021.060

Detection of Marek’s Disease Virus Serotypes 1, 2 and 3 in Poultry Flocks using PCR Technique in South-Western-Nigeria

2022· article· en· W4297136859 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Okpara, A O Okanlawon, Sadia Ameen, A Tinubu, A Osereime, H Ambali, Rafiu Adebisi Kadir, H Oyedele

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Veterinary and Allied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSpectra Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlockParenteral nutritionSerotypeFight-or-flight responseBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of early oral feeding (EOF) on vital parameters and some stress markers after intestinal surgery was the focus of this study. Sixteen (16) Nigerian indigenous dogs were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=4) which underwent duodenal resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Post operatively, group I animals were maintained on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for 3 days while groups II-IV animals had parenteral nutrition with oral feeding instituted at 8, 12 and 24 hours respectively. The animals were monitored for side effects of TPN and EOF and post-operative complications. Vital parameters and some stress markers like the glucose and cortisol levels were monitored. The Mean heart and pulse rates of group I (TPN) animals were significantly (P <0.05) higher than those of the EOF groups. The EOF groups had higher body weight post-operatively. On post-surgery day (PSD) 1, the mean glucose level of group I animals was significantly lower than those of group IV, while the mean cortisol values in all the groups showed a similar increase post-operatively which declined gradually after PSD 1. Therefore, EOF given 8, 12 or 24 hours after intestinal surgery is feasible, safe and more convenient, and improves nutritional status of dogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable Veterinary and Allied SciencesSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207