On Families QSL $$_{\ge 2}$$ of Quadratic Systems with Invariant Lines of Total Multiplicity At Least 2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let QSL $$_{\ge i}$$ be the family of quadratic differential systems with invariant lines of total multiplicity at least i and let QSL $$_{i}$$ denote the family of quadratic systems with invariant lines of total multiplicity exactly i. For any polynomial system the line at infinity is invariant. Thus the family $${{\varvec{QS}}}\,$$ of all quadratic systems is the same as QSL $$_{\ge 1}$$ . Our main interest is in the family QSL $$_{\ge 2}$$ , the largest strict sub-family of $${{\varvec{QS}}}\,$$ of systems having invariant lines. Our first goal is to give a brief survey of what we know so far about this family. At the moment we know everything about the family QSL $$_{\ge 4}$$ as well as about two important subfamilies of QSL $$_{3}$$ . Only two other subfamilies of QSL $$_{3}$$ remain to be studied. Our second goal is to give necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of invariant polynomials for systems to belong to one of these, namely the family QSL $$^{2p}$$ of quadratic systems with two parallel lines real or complex and to give the geometrical classification of this family. Our third goal is to complete a former partial result in the literature and obtain the global result on QSL $$_{\ge 2}$$ saying that the Hilbert number for this family is one. This opens the road for attempting to obtain the topological classification of QSL $$_{\ge 2}$$ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it