MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297222111 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-j3glh

Monitoring the solid-state VIS profiles of degrading bloodstains

2022· preprint· en· W4297222111 on OpenAlexafffund
Kgalalelo Rampete, Colin Elliott, Theresa Stotesbury

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicForensic and Genetic Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsMethemoglobinAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Principal component analysisChemistrySpectroscopyHemoglobinChromatographyMaterials scienceMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determining the time since deposition (TSD) of bloodstained evidence can be an important process in forensic investigations. Hemoglobin is often targeted as a biomolecule of interest for these purposes due to the known ex vivo oxidative changes to its structure. These time-dependent oxidative processes have previously been probed using UV-VIS spectroscopy following the resuspension of bloodstains. Our study investigated the solid-state VIS spectra of degrading bloodstains without sample pre-treatment, effectively bypassing the need for resuspension. A total of 128 bloodstains from eight biological replicates were created and stored on glass slides in four temperature conditions: -20°C, 4°C, 22°C, and 45°C. Spectra were acquired from 380 -800 nm at five time points spanning 96 hours. The peak area of the methemoglobin (metHb) band displayed the largest time and temperature differences, an interesting contrast to previous literature using the Soret band for TSD. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) demonstrated that storage temperature delineated the data, with the metHb band showing the greatest contributions to PC1. Linear mixed models from the PCA data with time showed clear TSD relationships with temperature, and with minimal inter-donor variability. Overall, this work complements the UV-VIS analysis of bloodstains for TSD estimation, with the importance of nothing clear differences between phases and sample preparation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicForensic and Genetic ResearchFrench-language works237,207