MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297229227 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.955242

Continuing early mTICI 2b recanalization may improve functional outcome but is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage

2022· article· en· W4297229227 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Steffen, Noel van Horn, Rosalie McDonough, Milani Deb‐Chatterji, Anna Alegiani, Götz Thomalla, Jens Fiehler, Fabian Flottmann

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModified Rankin ScaleConfoundingMedicineOcclusionStroke (engine)Internal medicineSurgeryIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2c/3) and low number of passes are key determinants for good clinical outcome in acute large vessel occlusion. While final mTICI 2c/3 reperfusion is superior to partial reperfusion (mTICI 2b) it remains unclear if this is also true for the subgroup of patients with early mTICI 2b (achieved in ≤2 retrieval attempts) reperfusion who are secondarily improved to mTICI 2c/3. This study was designed to examine if early mTICI2b should be continued or stopped during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods Nine hundred and thirteen ischemic stroke patients who received MT were retrospectively analyzed. Angiography runs following each recanalization attempt were scored for mTICI. The patients with early mTICI 2b reperfusions were dichotomized in “TICI2b-stopped” (MT withdrawal after mTICI 2b was achieved with first or second retrieval) and “TICI2b-continued” (MT was continued after mTICI 2b was achieved with first or second retrieval). Functional outcome was obtained after 90 days using the modified Rankin scale (mRS90). Results Of 362 Patients with a M1-occlusion, 100 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria with an early mTICI 2b. 78/100 patients were included in the “TICI2b-stopped” group and 22/100 patients were in the “TICI2b-continued” group. Of these 22 patients, none had a final mTICI score lower than 2b and 11 patients had a final mTICI score of 2c/3. Regarding good functional outcome at mRS90, “TICI2b-continued” showed by trend a slight advantage of 40.1 vs. 35.6% in “TICI2b-stopped” but in multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders, no significant difference was found between the two groups (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.19–2.87, p = 0.67). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher in “TICI2b-continued” compared to “TICI2b-stopped” (31.8 vs. 10.3%, p = 0.031). Conclusion Successfully improving an early mTICI 2b to mTICI 2c/3 reperfusion is possible in a substantial number of patients and might improve functional outcome. However, an increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) due to further retrieval attempts may diminish the potential functional benefit to continue early mTICI 2b. To support this finding, further investigation with more power is needed to account for the low number of events regarding SICH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207