Efficient and Consistent Two Key-Frame Visual-Inertial Navigation Using Matrix Lie Groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the design of a two key-frame visual-inertial navigation system (2KF-VINS) using a combined Lie group SE2(3) extended Kalman filter (EKF) design framework. The conventional 2KF-VINS filter is unobservable for translations along all three axes and rotation about the gravity direction. As a result, the filter suffers from estimation inconsistencies related to unobservable transformations of the estimation problem. The proposed combined Lie group SE2(3) framework remedies this issue by implicitly preserving the observability consistency property of the filter. Monte Carlo numerical simulations are used to validate the theoretical performance of the right−SE2(3) 2KF-VINS, along with experimental validation using the EuRoC micro aerial vehicle (MAV) dataset to evaluate the performance in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the proposed algorithm is compared with state-of-the-art MSCKF, RI-MSCKF, left−SO(3), and right−SO(3) 2KF-VINS versions with identical and realistic tuning parameters to validate the performance related to the accuracy, consistency, and computational speed of the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".