MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297349119 · doi:10.56952/arma-2022-0341

Characterizing Rock Fractures and Physical Properties for Experiment 2 of the EGS Collab Project, Sanford Underground Research Facility

2022· article· en· W4297349119 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Ulrich, Patrick Dobson, Timothy J. Kneafsey, William Roggenthen, N. Uzunlar, T. W. Doe, Ghanashyam Neupane, T. Artz, K. Dobler, Paul Schwering, Megan L. Smith, J. Burghardt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGeologySuiteTestbedMining engineeringIgneous petrologyGeophysicsEngineering geologyTectonicsVolcanismGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringSeismologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The EGS Collab project is focused on understanding and predicting permeability enhancement and evolution in crystalline rocks to support geothermal energy production. To support this effort, the project is creating a suite of intermediate-scale test beds coupled with stimulation and interwell flow tests that will provide a basis to better understand the fracture geometries and processes that control heat transfer between rock and stimulated fractures. Therefore, high level site characterization is paramount for building models to estimate potential interwell flow rates and heat exchanges. For the second experimental testbed, the EGS Collab team visually mapped the distribution, orientation, and nature of open and healed fractures exposed along the drift wall in the Sanford Underground Research Facility 4100 feet below ground surface, and within the eleven boreholes drilled for this test bed. Continuous core logging of each borehole and a suite of geophysical wireline logs was collected to characterize the spatial variability of rock properties and fracture orientations. All of the data were then compiled into multiple 3D visualization software packages for interpretation and further analyzed for slip and dilation tendencies that will be incorporated into coupled-process geomechanical flow and transport models to better constrain the planned flow and tracer tests. 1. INTRODUCTION Following the completion of Experiment 1 at 4850 feet below ground surface (the 4850 level), the EGS Collab team initiated the development of a second testbed for Experiment 2 (E2) in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF and former Homestake Gold Mine) in Lead, South Dakota, USA. The overarching goal of the EGS Collab project is to create field test beds to host stimulation and interwell flow tests that will provide improved understanding of fracture stimulation methods, resulting fracture geometries, and processes that control heat transfer between rock and stimulated fractures for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). This experiment will contrast from Experiment 1 in that its goal is to create a series of hydro shear fractures for interwell flow tests in support of the EGS Collab project (Kneafsey et al., 2018) at the intermediate-scale (~10-20 m). In the winter-spring of 2021, the EGS Collab team started to develop the E2 testbed on the 4100 level (1.25 km below the ground surface).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207