Load-dependent inverted U–shaped connectivity of the default mode network in schizophrenia during a working-memory task: evidence from a replication functional MRI study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Working-memory deficit is associated with aberrant degree distribution of the brain connectome in schizophrenia. However, the brain neural mechanism underlying the degree redistribution pattern in schizophrenia is still uncertain. METHODS: We examined the functional degree distribution of the connectome in 81 patients with schizophrenia and 77 healthy controls across different working-memory loads during an n-back task. We tested the associations between altered degree distribution and clinical symptoms, and we conducted functional connectivity analyses to investigate the neural mechanism underlying altered degree distribution. We repeated these analyses in a second independent data set of 96 participants. In the second data set, we employed machine-learning analysis to study whether the degree distribution pattern of one data set could be used to discriminate between patients with schizophrenia and controls in the other data set. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia showed decreased centrality in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex (dPCC) for the "2-back versus 0-back" contrast compared to healthy controls. The dPCC centrality pattern across all working-memory loads was an inverted U shape, with a left shift of this pattern in patients with schizophrenia. This reduced centrality was correlated with the severity of delusions and related to reduced functional connectivity between the dPCC and the dorsal precuneus. We replicated these results with the second data set, and the machine-learning analyses achieved an accuracy level of 71%. LIMITATIONS: We used a limited n-back paradigm that precluded the examination of higher working-memory loads. CONCLUSION: Schizophrenia is characterized by a load-dependent reduction of centrality in the dPCC, related to the severity of delusions. We suggest that restoring dPCC centrality in the presence of cognitive demands might have a therapeutic effect on persistent delusions in people with schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".