MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297669238 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.032003

Simulating the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment

2022· article· en· W4297669238 on OpenAlexaff
D. Akimov, Peng An, C. Awe, P. S. Barbeau, Bruce Becker, V. Belov, I. Bernardi, M. A. Blackston, C. Bock, A. Bolozdynya, J. Browning, Belkis Cabrera-Palmer, D. Chernyak, E. Conley, J. Daughhetee, J. A. Detwiler, K. Ding, M. Durand, Y. V. Efremenko, S. R. Elliott, L. Fabris, M. Febbraro, J. Galambos, A. Gallo Rosso, A. Galindo-Uribarri, M. P. Green, M. R. Heath, S. Hedges, D. Hoang, M. Hughes, Erik B. Iverson, T. Johnson, А. В. Хромов, A. M. Konovalov, E. Kozlova, A. Kumpan, L. Li, J. M. Link, J. Liu, Kulwinder Singh Mann, D. M. Markoff, J. Mastroberti, Mark McIntyre, P. E. Mueller, J. Newby, D. S. Parno, S. Penttilä, D. Pershey, R. Rapp, H. Ray, J. Raybern, O. Razuvaeva, D. Reyna, G. C. Rich, D. Rimal, J. Ross, D. Rudik, J. Runge, D. J. Salvat, A. M. Salyapongse, K. Scholberg, A. Shakirov, G. Simakov, G. Sinev, W. M. Snow, V. Sosnovstsev, B. Suh, R. Tayloe, K. Tellez-Giron-Flores, I. Tolstukhin, Steven Trotter, E. Ujah, J. Vanderwerp, R. L. Varner, C. J. Virtue, G. Visser, T. Wongjirad, Y.-R. Yen, J. Yoo, C.-H. Yu, J. Zettlemoyer, S. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryHigh Energy PhysicsNuclear PhysicsOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationSandia National LaboratoriesNational Nuclear Security AdministrationMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationOffice of ScienceMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Research FoundationCarnegie Mellon UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaU.S. Department of EnergyOak Ridge Associated UniversitiesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSpallationSpallation Neutron SourceNeutrinoNuclear physicsOak Ridge National LaboratoryNeutron sourceNeutronFlux (metallurgy)Neutron fluxNeutron time-of-flight scatteringNeutron scatteringParticle physicsNeutron cross section

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a pulsed source of neutrons and, as a by-product of this operation, an intense source of pulsed neutrinos via stopped-pion decay. The COHERENT collaboration uses this source to investigate coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering and other physics with a suite of detectors. This work includes a description of our geant4 simulation of neutrino production at the SNS and the flux calculation which informs the COHERENT studies. We estimate the uncertainty of this calculation at the $\ensuremath{\sim}10%$ level based on validation against available low-energy ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ production data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.409 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207