MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297686164 · doi:10.1117/12.2627870

Design and analysis of the NRC Q-band receiver for ngVLA band-5

2022· article· en· W4297686164 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sara Salem Hesari, Doug Henke, В. А. Решетов, B. Veidt, Alireza Seyfollahi, Nianhua Jiang, L. B. G. Knee

Bibliographic record

VenueMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radio instrumentation team (RIT) at NRC’s (National Research Council Canada) Herzberg astronomy and astrophysics research center (HAA) is currently developing a dual-linear polarization, single-feed Q-band cryogenic radio astronomy receiver to develop and demonstrate important technologies needed for front-end development for the next generation very large array (ngVLA) project lead by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO). The specific target is the ngVLA band-5 receiver, which covers the frequency range 30.5–50.5 GHz. It also serves as a technology demonstrator for component development for ngVLA bands-3, 4, and 6. The Q-band receiver system is designed to achieve a receiver noise temperature of less than 20 K over 70% of the bandwidth and better than 24 K over the complete operating bandwidth, and is compliant with the current ngVLA Band-5 receiver requirement. The receiver system consists of a cryostat with a cooled feed horn, a turnstile OMT (orthomode transducer) plus two noise couplers for calibration, two cryogenic mHEMT low noise amplifiers with noise temperature lower than 14 K, IR filters, and a vacuum window for low-loss transmission of electromagnetic fields into the cryostat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XISame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207