Plataforma Agrologistica 2030 : A diagnosis of the potential for public-private partnerships in the Mexican agrologisticssector following the Dutch top sector model, Final Report, 1 July 2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 21st century is characterized by major global challenges that transcend countries and sectors.We are confronted with depleted natural resources of our planet, malnutrition continues to be a global problem, cities are becoming overcrowded and the climate is rapidly changing.With knowledge, education and research of the highest possible standard, Wageningen University & Research aims to tackle global challenges and shape and accelerate the required transitions.We do that together with new and existing partners all over the world, we aim to find answers together.Wageningen University & Research has been active in Mexico for over 15 years in multiple themes, including agroparks, horticulture, agrologistics and water management.With our contribution we aim to improve the Mexican food system via more efficient production of food products, less food waste, more sustainable logistics and thriving markets.Agrologistics concerns all activities in the supply chain to match product supply from the farm with market demand for those products.It aims at getting the right agri-food product, at the right place, at the right time, according to the right specifications (including quality and sustainability requirements) at the lowest cost.Fulfilling this aim requires collaboration of many actors in the food system.In the Netherlands we understand the importance of agrologistics, since this is one of the major industries of our economy, and also one of the fastest growing since the nineties.I welcome the cooperation with the Mexican business community, represented by the National Agrifood Council (CNA), Mexican government institutions (FND and FOCIR) and academia to improve agrologistics in Mexico.Both countries have much to give and much to learn from each other.This project has strengthened the cooperation between WUR and Mexican partners.We look forward to further expanding and intensifying our cooperation with the aim of increasing sustainability and strengthening the economic position of the agri-food sector in both countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".