MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297694346 · doi:10.2138/am-2022-8412

Discrete late Jurassic Sn mineralizing events in the Xianghualing Ore District, South China: Constraints from cassiterite and garnet U-Pb geochronology

2022· article· en· W4297694346 on OpenAlexaff
Kexin Wang, Degao Zhai, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones, Dengfeng Li, Jiajun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCassiteriteSkarnGeologyGeochemistrySphaleriteMineralization (soil science)ArsenopyriteActinoliteTopazGalenaOre genesisWolframiteMolybdeniteBiotiteMineralogyChalcopyriteQuartzFluid inclusionsPyriteChloriteTinChemistryEpidote

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Numerous skarn-type Sn deposits have been identified in the Nanling Range (South China), of which the Shizhuyuan W-Sn-Bi-Mo, Xianghualing Sn, Jinchuantang Sn-Bi, and Hehuaping Sn deposits are the largest. The Xianghualing deposit, which is the focus of this study, hosts a resource of 0.17 Mt Sn grading 0.93–1.39 wt% SnO2. Whether the distal skarn-type mineralization and the cassiteritesulfide vein-type orebody in the Xianghualing district are genetically related to the Laiziling granitic pluton, which produced the proximal skarn-type Sn mineralization, however, is still unknown. The Xianghualing Sn mineralization occurs exclusively as cassiterite and has been subdivided into four ore-types: (1) lenticular proximal skarn ore (Cst I) containing the mineral assemblage cassiteritepyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-actinolite-wollastonite; (2) layered distal skarn ore (Cst II) containing the mineral assemblage cassiterite-pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-actinolite; (3) vein cassiterite-sulfide ore (Cst III) distal from the skarn and associated granite containing the mineral assemblage cassiterite-arsenopyrite-pyrrhotite-muscovite-fluorite; and (4) veinlet Sn-Pb-Zn ore (Cst IV) distal from the skarn and associated granite containing the mineral assemblage cassiterite-galena-sphalerite-topaz-quartz. Here, we report the results of in situ laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric (LA-ICPMS) U-Pb age determinations for garnet from the Xianghualing skarn and the above four types of cassiterite. Our age determinations indicate that there were two independent magmatic-hydrothermal events at ~160 and 156~150 Ma, both of which led to Sn mineralization. The first Sn mineralization event at ~160 Ma (Cst IV U-Pb ages of 159.6 ± 1.4 to 158.5 ± 0.8 Ma) is interpreted to have been associated with a speculative unexposed granitic pluton, which is coeval with the nearby Jianfengling granite intrusion. The second Sn mineralization event at 156~150 Ma (Cst I to Cst III U-Pb ages of 155.9 ± 0.7 to 152.3 ± 1.1 Ma and garnet U-Pb ages of 153.6 ± 7.6 to 151.5 ± 3.5 Ma) is genetically related to the adjacent Laiziling granitic intrusion (152.8 ± 1.2 Ma, zircon U-Pb age). This event was responsible for the bulk of the Sn resource (>95%). Our age determinations provide convincing evidence for superimposed Jurassic Sn mineralizing systems at Xianghualing. They also show the value of combining garnet and cassiterite U-Pb age determinations to constrain the timing of skarn and Sn mineralization and distinguish discrete Sn mineralizing events in a protracted metallogenic history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207