Evaluasi Jalur Pedestrian Koridor Jalan Raya Cilegon - Jalan SA Tirtayasa Kota Cilegon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Pedestrian path is a special path for pedestrians that is separated from the vehicle traffic lane, has a higher surface elevation, is located next to and parallel to the vehicle traffic lane. Evaluation of pedestrian paths is certainly important as a consideration for revitalizing pedestrian paths so that they can function properly and provide comfort to pedestrians. Ideally the pedestrian path can provide comfort, enjoyment, security, and safety. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pedestrian path in the corridor of Jalan Raya Cilegon to Jalan SA Tirtayasa, Cilegon City so that the causes of pedestrian malfunctions are known and become input for the Cilegon City government in revitalizing pedestrian paths. The author uses an empirical, quantitative, qualitative and mix method approach. with primary and secondary data collection using literature studies, interviews, observations, questionnaires, and documentation. The author uses descriptive analysis techniques, descriptive statistics, and multiple linear regression. Based on this analysis, the results of the suitability and completeness of the pedestrian path elements, the causes of the change in the function of the pedestrian path, and the variables that affect pedestrian comfort, are used as inputs in revitalizing the pedestrian path of the Cilegon Highway Corridor to SA Tirtayasa Street, Cilegon City, so that development can be carried out effectively and efficiently, and pedestrian paths can function as they should. Abstrak. Jalur pedestrian merupakan sebuah jalur khusus bagi pejalan kaki yang terpisah dari jalur lalu lintas kendaraan, memiliki elevasi permukaan yang lebih tinggi, terletak bersebelahan dan sejajar dengan jalur lalu lintas kendaraan. Evaluasi jalur pedestrian tentu penting sebagai bahan pertimbangan untuk merevitalisasi jalur pedestrian sehingga dapat berfungsi kembali sebagaimana mestinya dan memberikan kenyamanan kepada pejalan kaki. Idealnya jalur pedestrian dapat memberikan kenyamanan, kenikmatan, keamanan, dan keselamatan. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengevaluasi jalur pedestrian pada koridor jalan Raya Cilegon hingga jalan SA Tirtayasa Kota Cilegon agar diketahui penyebab tidak berfungsinya pedestrian dan menjadi masukan bagi pemerintah Kota Cilegon dalam merevitalisasi jalur pedestrian, penulis menggunakan metode pendekatan memakai empiris, kuantitatif, kualitatif dan mix methods dengan pengumpulan data primer dan sekunder menggunakan studi literatur, wawancara, observasi, kuesioner, dan dokumentasi. Penulis menggunakan teknik analisis deksriptif, statistik deskriptif, serta regresi linier berganda. Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, didapatkan hasil kesesuaian dan kelengkapan elemen jalur pedestrian, penyebab terjadinya alih fungsi jalur pedestrian, dan variabel yang mempengaruhi kenyamanan pejalan kaki, untuk digunakan sebagai bahan masukan dalam merevitalisai jalur pedestrian koridor jalan Raya Cilegon hingga jalan SA Tirtayasa Kota Cilegon, sehingga pembangunan dapat dilakukan secara efektif dan efisien, serta jalur pedestrian dapat berfungsi kembali sebagaimana mestinya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".