Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Science and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesOffice of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaUniversità degli Studi di PadovaArgonne National LaboratoryIndustry CanadaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSIsrael Science FoundationUnited States-Israel Binational Science FoundationJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial FoundationMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoPlanning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of IsraelDanmarks GrundforskningsfondGovernment of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionFermilabUniversity of MinnesotaNational Science FoundationSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Computer scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis chapter summarises the physics opportunities in the search and study of physics beyond the Standard Model at the 100 TeV pp collider.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
