Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 76-year-old man presents for a routine outpatient cardiology visit. He has a 15-year history of type 2 diabetes, with several diabetes-related microvascular complications, including stage III chronic kidney disease and mild peripheral neuropathy. He is currently on a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (SU; sustained release glipizide) for glucose control, with last hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 8.5%. Although the patient never sustained a myocardial infarction, he has a complex and longstanding history of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), requiring two-vessel coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) 7 years ago, and several subsequent percutaneous interventions (PCIs). Despite multiple interventions, patient continues to have chronic Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 2–3 angina, with typical midsternal chest pressure upon mild-to-moderate physical activity—the pattern of angina has been stable for the past 5 years, but it interferes significantly with his quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".