The Impact of Nutritional Supplementation on Donor Kidneys During Oxygenated Ex Vivo Subnormothermic Preservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evidence suggests that nutritional supplementation during normothermic ex vivo perfusion improves organ preservation. However, it is unclear whether the same benefit is observed during room temperature (subnormothermic) oxygenated perfusion. In this study, we tested the impact of providing complete nutrition during subnormothermic perfusion on kidney outcomes. Methods: Porcine kidneys were recovered after 30 min of cross clamping the renal artery in situ to simulate warm ischemic injury. After flushing with preservation solution, paired kidneys were cannulated and randomly assigned to perfusion with either (1) hemoglobin-carrier hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier or (2) hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier + total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for 12 h at 22 °C. To mimic reperfusion injury, all kidneys were reperfused with whole blood for an additional 4 h at 37 °C. Kidney function and damage were assessed. Results: Kidneys preserved with or without TPN performed equally well, showing similar renal function postreperfusion. Histological findings indicated similar levels of damage from apoptosis staining and acute tubular necrosis scores in both groups. Additionally, markers of renal damage (KIM-1) and inflammation (IL-6; high-mobility group box 1) were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Unlike other studies using normothermic oxygenated perfusion platforms, nutritional supplementation does not appear to provide any additional benefit during ex vivo kidney preservation over 12 h evaluated by whole blood-based reperfusion method at subnormothermic temperature. Further study should include a kidney autotransplant model to assess the role of TPN in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".