MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4297910187 · doi:10.1101/2022.09.23.22280266

Effects of exercise on sleep in children with overweight/obesity: A randomized clinical trial

2022· preprint· en· W4297910187 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia V. Torres‐Lopez, Jairo H. Migueles, Cristina Cadenas‐Sánchez, Marcus Bendtsen, Pontus Henriksson, José Mora-González, Marie Löf, Jean‐Philippe Chaput, Francisco B. Ortega

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónFundación Alicia KoplowitzEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesJunta de AndalucíaUniversidad de GranadaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsOverweightActigraphyMedicineSleep onsetPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialSleep (system call)ObesityInsomniaInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives To examine 1) the chronic effects of a 20-week physical exercise program on device-assessed sleep and on sleep-disordered breathing (SDB); and 2) whether attending to a session of the exercise program had effects on device-assessed sleep the subsequent night in children with overweight/obesity. Methods A total of 99 children with overweight/obesity (n=47 in the exercise group) participated in this secondary analysis of the ActiveBrains randomized clinical trial. The exercise program included a combination of aerobic and resistance exercise training, 3-5 days/week (90 min/session). The control group was asked to maintain usual lifestyle. Sleep outcomes were measured using wrist actigraphy and included: total sleep time, total time in bed, sleep efficiency, and wake after sleep onset (WASO) time. SDB was assessed via the Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire. Results The ActiveBrains exercise program had a statistically significant effect on WASO time (−10.8 min/day, -0.5 standard deviations (SD), P =0.040). Furthermore, we observed a small non-statistically significant effect on sleep efficiency (+2%, 0.4 SD, P =0.1). No other chronic effects were observed on the other sleep outcomes. The nights (at maximum of 4) after attending the ActiveBrains exercise sessions, children showed higher total sleep time (+8 min, P =0.17), sleep efficiency (+1%, P =0.15), and lower WASO time (−6 min, P =0.18) although did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion A 20-week physical exercise program reduced WASO time in children with overweight/obesity in comparison with control group peers, yet we did not observe effects on SDB. Future randomized trials that include a clinical sample of children with poor sleep health at baseline are needed to better appreciate the role of exercise in sleep health. Clinal Trial Registration The ActiveBrains project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , no. NCT02295072 . Data Sharing Statement: We did not obtain children’s parents consent to widely share the data nor was it included in the IRB protocol. What’s known on this subject Sleep is an essential component in children’s health. Previous researchers have found positive effects of exercise on sleep in adolescents with obesity, but the literature in childhood obesity is lacking. What this study adds A physical exercise program showed positive effects on device-assessed sleep habits in children with overweight/obesity, yet not on sleep-disordered breathing. Exercise programs should be promoted in children to improve their sleep health, especially in those with overweight/obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→