Causse de Sauveterre landscape: perceptions of the agricultural and wooded areas dynamic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report is in keeping with a national research programme on the effects of public policies on the landscape dynamics in the south of Massif Central It analyses specifically the perceptions of the agricultural and wooded areas dynamic on the causse de Sauveterre (Lozère, Massif Central). The first part of the study focuses on the notion of " closing of landscape " and the landscape stakes in the causse de Sauveterre. The second part deals with the description of agricultural and wooded areas and practices by various categories of actors - farmers / landowners / inhabitants. It analyses their practices and attitudes about the areas and how they appreciate the landscape. The end of the study concludes on the perception of the dynamic of different areas and specifies the notion of " enclosure of landscape ". / Ce rapport s'inscrit dans le cadre d'un programme de recherche pluridisciplinaire sur les effets des politiques publiques sur la dynamique des paysages dans le sud du Massif central (Programme " Politiques Publiques et Paysages " initié par le Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement). Il explore les qualifications territoriales et paysagères des habitants d'une commune du causse des Sauveterre (Laval-du-Tarn en Lozère). La première partie de l'étude se concentre sur la notion de " fermeture du paysage " et les enjeux paysagers du causse de Sauveterre. La deuxième partie aborde la description des espaces agricoles et boisés et des pratiques par différentes catégories d'acteurs - gestionnaires ou non de l'espace - et analyse leurs rapports à ces espaces et les valeurs qu'ils leurs associent. En fin d'étude, la perception de la dynamique des différents espaces est analysée et des éléments de réflexion sont apportés sur la notion de " fermeture du paysage ".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".