Exploring the origin of the internal rotational barrier for molecules with one rotatable dihedral angle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continuing our recent endeavor, we systematically investigate in this work the origin of internal rotational barriers for small molecules using the new energy partition scheme proposed recently by one of the authors [S. B. Liu, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 244103 (2007)], where the total electronic energy is decomposed into three independent components, steric, electrostatic, and fermionic quantum. Specifically, we focus in this work on six carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen containing hydrides, CH3CH3, CH3NH2, CH3OH, NH2NH2, NH2OH, and H2O2, with only one rotatable dihedral angle ∠H–X–Y–H (X,Y=C,N,O). The relative contributions of the different energy components to the total energy difference as a function of the internal dihedral rotation will be considered. Both optimized-geometry (adiabatic) and fixed-geometry (vertical) differences are examined, as are the results from the conventional energy partition and natural bond orbital analysis. A wealth of strong linear relationships among the total energy difference and energy component differences for different systems have been observed but no universal relationship applicable to all systems for both cases has been discovered, indicating that even for simple systems such as these, there exists no omnipresent, unique interpretation on the nature and origin of the internal rotation barrier. Different energy components can be employed for different systems in the rationalization of the barrier height. Confirming that the two differences, adiabatic and vertical, are disparate in nature, we find that for the vertical case there is a unique linear relationship applicable to all the six molecules between the total energy difference and the sum of the kinetic and electrostatic energy differences. For the adiabatic case, it is the total potential energy difference that has been found to correlate well with the total energy difference except for ethane whose rotation barrier is dominated by the quantum effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".