MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4297989190 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2022-0082

Was the San Quintín kangaroo rat really rediscovered?

2022· article· en· W4297989190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jorge Andrade-Sánchez, María Clara Arteaga, Eric Mellink

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja California
KeywordsBiologyZoologyMitochondrial DNASympatric speciationPopulationEcologyAnatomyDemographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The San Quintín kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys gravipes Huey, 1925) is one of the three kangaroo rats in northwestern Baja California and the largest of them in most body dimensions. After a dramatic population decline in the 1980s, it was declared as potentially extinct in the wild by Mexican law. In 2017, the species was claimed to be rediscovered, but critical data supporting the species recognition were not provided. The question remained: Was the San Quintín kangaroo rat really rediscovered? We analyzed individuals identified by us as D. gravipes to validate our identification. We compared cranial morphometric and mitochondrial data of on-purpose collected specimens with those of historic specimens and with those of sympatric kangaroo rats in Baja California, particularly the Dulzura kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys simulans (Merriam, 1904)). Cranial morphometry and body dimensions of current specimens are indistinguishable from those of historic D. gravipes, while being different from D. simulans in most dimensions. External measurements such as cranial traits adequately distinguish both species. The mitochondrial analysis revealed strong support for the species grouping of sequences of our specimens and DNA sequences of D. gravipes from the GenBank repository. This study comprises a morphometric and molecular confirmation of the presence of the species after >25 years of failures to find it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→