MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298007858 · doi:10.2147/opth.s381368

Clinical and Visual Field Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Combined with Cataract Surgery

2022· article· en· W4298007858 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus L. Turner, Abu M Taha, Sean Yonamine, Yinxi Yu, Murtaza Saifee, Mike Yang, Gui‐Shuang Ying, Ying Han, Julius T. Oatts

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical ophthalmology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsPrism Eye Institute
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsMedicineGlaucomaIntraocular pressureVisual fieldCataract surgeryOphthalmologyVisual acuityAbsolute deviationGlaucoma surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine the change in Humphrey visual field and clinical parameters after minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery in a multicenter retrospective case series between 2013 and 2021 with reliable preoperative and 12 to 18 month postoperative visual field measurements were included. Devices included iStent, XEN, and Hydrus. Clinical parameters were compared with a generalized linear model with generalized estimating equations between preoperative and postoperative visits including best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of glaucoma medications and visual fields. Visual field metrics included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) score of total deviation probability and pattern deviation probability. Results: Forty-four eyes from 39 patients were included. During the follow up period, visual acuity improved from 0.23± 0.17 to 0.10± 0.14 logMAR (mean ± standard deviation, p < 0.001), number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 2.68± 1.06 to 1.46± 1.32 ( p < 0.001), and intraocular pressure decreased from 17.08± 4.23 mmHg to 14.92± 3.13 mmHg ( p =0.003). Differences across devices were negligible. The only significant difference was a greater reduction in number of glaucoma medications in the XEN group ( p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the global parameters of VFI, MD, PSD, or CIGTS. Conclusion: Overall, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery appears to be effective at stabilizing visual field function, reducing intraocular pressure, reducing number of glaucoma medications, and improving visual acuity over a 12 to 18 month follow-up period across MIGS devices. Keywords: glaucoma, MIGS, visual field, cataract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ophthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207