A Semantic Segmentation Method for Road Environment Images Based on Hybrid Convolutional Auto-Encoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have presented amazing performance in the task of semantic segmentation. However, the network model is complex, the training time is prolonged, the semantic segmentation accuracy is not high and the real-time performance is not good, so it is difficult to be directly used in the semantic segmentation of road environment images of autonomous vehicles. As one of the three models of deep learning, the auto-encoder (AE) has powerful data learning and feature extracting capabilities from the raw data itself. In this study, the network architecture of auto-encoder and convolutional auto-encoder (CAE) is improved, supervised learning auto-encoder and improved convolutional auto-encoder are proposed, and a hybrid convolutional auto-encoder model is constructed by combining them. It can extract low-dimensional abstract features of road environment images by using convolution layers and pooling layers in front of the network, and then supervised learning auto-encoder are used to enhance and express semantic segmentation features, and finally de-convolution layers and un-pooling layers are used to generate semantic segmentation results. The hybrid convolutional auto-encoder model proposed in this paper not only contains encoding and decoding parts which are used in the common semantic segmentation models, but also adds semantic feature enhancing and representing parts, so that the network which has fewer convolutional and pooling layers can still achieve better semantic segmentation effects. Compared to the semantic segmentation based on convolutional neural networks, the hybrid convolutional auto-encoder has fewer network layers, fewer network parameters, and simpler network training. We evaluated our proposed method on Camvid and Cityscapes, which are standard benchmarks for semantic segmentation, and it proved to have a better semantic segmentation effect and good real-time performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".