MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W429801047 · doi:10.25071/0848-1563.39128

“An Enterprise Calculated To Knit The Union”: Evangelical Hymnody and Church Union in Canada, 1925-1931

2010· article· en· W429801047 on OpenAlexaffabout
David K. McFarland

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipHymnProtestantismSupperPassionChurch historyReligious studiesTheologyLawEucharistHistoryClassicsSociologyArtArt historyPolitical sciencePhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early spring of 1931 dignitaries and assembled leaders of the United Church of Canada -in a celebratory mood -met for an evening on the Roof Garden of the Royal York Hotel in downtown Toronto to recognize a much-anticipated achievement in the liturgical life of their young Protestant denomination. After guests had dined, a special presentation by the General Council of the United Church honoured the labours of the Reverend Alexander MacMillan and of the church's Committee on Church Worship and Ritual; it

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207