Research in Consumer Behavior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2011), "Research in Consumer Behavior", Belk, R.W., Grayson, K., Muñiz, A.M. and Jensen Schau, H. (Ed.) Research in Consumer Behavior (Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 13), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. iii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-2111(2011)0000013020 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Research in Consumer Behavior Research in Consumer Behavior Research in Consumer Behavior Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction Collaborative Value Co-Creation in Crowd-Sourced Online Communities – Acknowledging and Resolving Competing Commercial and Communal Orientations If you can't Stand the Heat, get out of the Kitchen: Foodies Resist the Cultural Authority of the Market Show me the Mascot: Corralling Critters for Pedagogic Purposes A Typology of Consumption Communities Food, Love and Meta-Practices: A Study of Everyday Dinner Consumption Among Single Mothers We Dream as we Live – Consuming Buying the Girlfriend Experience: An Exploration of the Consumption Experiences of Male Customers of Escorts The Cultural Role of Stigmatized Youth Groups: The Case of the Partille Johnnys of Sweden Love and Videogames: Negotiating Relationships with Cultural Ideals and Consumer Practices Skating Dialectics and Flipping Genealogy Staring: How Facebook Facilitates the Breaking of Social Norms The Modern Woman Myth as a means of Cosmopolitan Cultural Capital Accumulation: A Gendered Acculturation Perspective The Nouveaux Pauvres of Liquid Modernity Realistically Fake: Self-Reflexive Consciousness, Ironic (Dis)Engagement with Hybrid Reality Television, and their Impact on Consumption
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".