MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298045657 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02924

A completely bounded non-commutative Choquet boundary for operator\n spaces

2017· preprint· W4298045657 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Raphaël Clouâtre, Christopher Bronk Ramsey

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsBounded functionOperator spaceCommutative propertyBounded operatorChoquet theoryPure mathematicsMultiplicative functionHilbert spaceDiscrete mathematicsOperator algebraNorm (philosophy)Operator (biology)Boundary (topology)Finite-rank operatorBanach spaceRegular polygonMathematical analysisConvex set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a completely bounded counterpart to the non-commutative Choquet\nboundary of an operator space. We show how the class of completely bounded\nlinear maps is too large to accommodate our purposes. To overcome this\nobstacle, we isolate the subset of completely bounded linear maps on an\noperator space admitting a dilation of the same norm which is multiplicative on\nthe generated $C^*$-algebra. We view such maps as analogues of the familiar\nunital completely contractive maps, and we exhibit many of their structural\nproperties. Of particular interest to us are those maps which are extremal with\nrespect to a natural dilation order. We establish the existence of extremals\nand show that they have a certain unique extension property. In particular,\nthey give rise to $*$-homomorphisms which we use to associate to any\nrepresentation of an operator space an entire scale of $C^*$-envelopes. We\nconjecture that these $C^*$-envelopes are all $*$-isomorphic, and verify this\nin some important cases.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207