Evaluation the Change Process of traditional Residential Architecture, in the case of Denizli, Altintop Quarter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Denizli, being a city of Anatolia, has lost her cultural heritage because of rapid industrial developments. The traditional urban fabric of Ottoman period was almost totally destroyed but there are some parts in the city dating to the years 1950-1980 which carry traditional character. Neighborhood of Altıntop is one of those settlements comprising the last examples of the traditional houses. Being in the contemporary city center, the houses of Altıntop are under pressure of common economical transformations. This study is processed in two cases. First case is the typological analysis of the houses carrying traditional character in the first residential areas of the city – the neighborhoods of Gürcan, Surakapılar, Altıntop, Feslikan. The results are evaluated comparatively with the previous studies about traditional Denizli house and traditional houses of the city are categorized chronologically regarding their spatial transformations. In the second case traditional houses of Altıntop are analyzed according to the categories driven in the first case and several suggestions are developed for the future conservation of the fabric. The aim of the study is to put forward the traditional and spatial values of the cultural heritage which is hidden in the ordinary houses of the neighborhood of Altıntop. Its contribution to knowledge intends to establish guidelines for the conservation of the cultural heritage in the future planning studies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".