MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298086443 · doi:10.1002/ppul.26171

Chronic tracheostomy care of ventilator‐dependent and ‐independent children: Clinical practice patterns of pediatric respirologists in a publicly funded (Canadian) healthcare system

2022· article· en· W4298086443 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aaron St‐Laurent, David Zielinski, Adam Qazi, Aceel Al-Awadi, Darryl J. Adamko, Tareq Alabdoulsalam, Jackie Chiang, Michael Derynck, Chris Gerdung, Karen Kam, Sherri L. Katz, Ian MacLusky, Kevan Mehta, Dimas Mateos, The Thanh D. Nguyen, Jean‐Paul Praud, Frédéric Proulx, Michael Seear, Mary Jane Smith, David Wensley, Reshma Amin

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Pulmonology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreAlberta Children's HospitalStollery Children's HospitalNova Scotia Health AuthorityChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's UniversityChildren's Hospital of WinnipegHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of AlbertaSaskatoon City HospitalUniversity of ManitobaUniversité de SherbrookeMontreal Children's HospitalMcMaster Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTertiary careTracheostomy tubeAirway managementAirwayIntensive care medicinePediatric hospitalHealth careMechanical ventilationMedical emergencyEmergency medicinePediatricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current clinical practice patterns of Canadian pediatric respirologists at pediatric tertiary care institutions regarding chronic tracheostomy tube care and management of home invasive ventilation. METHODS: A pediatric respirologist/pediatrician with expertise in tracheostomy tube care and home ventilation was identified at each Canadian pediatric tertiary care center to complete a 59-item survey of multiple choice and short answer questions. Domains assessed included tracheostomy tube care, caregiver competency and home monitoring, speaking valves, medical management of tracheostomy complications, decannulation, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% (17/17) with all Canadian tertiary care pediatric centers represented and heterogeneity of practice was observed in all domains assessed. For example, though most centers employ Bivona™ (17/17) and Shiley™ (15/17) tracheostomy tubes, variability was observed around tube change, re-use, and cleaning practices. Most centers require two trained caregivers (14/17) and recommend 24/7 eyes on care and oxygen saturation monitoring. Discharge with an emergency tracheostomy kit was universal (17/17). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the timing and use of speaking valves and speech-language assessment. Inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotics are employed by most centers (16/17) though the indication, agent, and protocol varied by center. Though decannulation practices varied considerably, the requirement of upper airway patency was universally required to proceed with decannulation (17/17) independent of ongoing ventilatory support requirements. CONCLUSION: Considerable variability in pediatric tracheostomy tube care practice exists across Canada. These results will serve as a starting point to standardize and evaluate tracheostomy tube care nationally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric PulmonologySame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207