Characterization of exogenous αSN response genes and their relation to Parkinson’s disease using network analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite extensive research, the molecular mechanisms underlying the toxicity of αSN in Parkinson’s disease (PD) pathology are still poorly understood. To address this, we used a microarray dataset to identify genes that are induced and differentially expressed after exposure to toxic αSN aggregates, which we call exogenous αSN response (EASR) genes. Using systems biology approaches, we then determined, at multiple levels of analysis, how these EASR genes could be related to PD pathology. A key result was the identification of functional connections between EASR genes and previously identified PD-related genes by employing the proteins’ interactions networks and 9 brain region-specific co-expression networks. In each brain region, co-expression modules of EASR genes were enriched for gene sets whose expression are altered by SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to the hypothesis that EASR co-expression genes may explain the observed links between COVID-19 and PD. An examination of the expression pattern of EASR genes in different non-neurological healthy brain regions revealed that regions with lower mean expression of the upregulated EASR genes, such as substantia nigra, are more vulnerable to αSN aggregates and lose their neurological functions during PD progression. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of healthy and PD samples from substantia nigra revealed that a specific co-expression network, “TNF-α signaling via NF-κB”, is an upregulated pathway associated with the PD phenotype. Inhibitors of the “TNF-α signaling via NF-κB” pathway may, therefore, decrease the activity level of this pathway and thereby provide therapeutic benefits for PD patients. We virtually screened FDA-approved drugs against these upregulated genes ( NR4A1 , DUSP1 , and FOS ) using docking-based drug discovery and identified several promising drugs. Altogether, our study provides a better understanding of αSN toxicity mechanisms in PD and identifies potential therapeutic targets and small molecules for treatment of PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".