MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298111006 · doi:10.1144/m57-2017-11

Sverdrup Basin Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, Canadian Arctic Islands

2022· article· en· W4298111006 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ashton Embry, Benoı̂t Beauchamp, Keith Dewing, C. G. A. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyClastic rockForeland basinEarly TriassicPermianSedimentary rockCarboniferousCretaceousOrogenySverdrupPaleozoicStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sverdrup Basin Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element (CTSE) covers 210 000 km 2 in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The CTSE was initiated in the Early Carboniferous by rifting of highly deformed Early Paleozoic strata and contains a maximum of 15 km of Carboniferous–Eocene strata. Eight phases of basin development have been recognized, with each being characterized by a specific combination of tectonic and depositional regimes. The phases are separated by intervals of uplift and tectonic reorganization, and each resultant first-order sequence is regarded as a separate TSE. Carbonate sedimentation was dominant in the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian, with clastic sedimentation becoming more common in the Middle Permian. Source areas lay to the east, south and north. In the Triassic, clastic sedimentation rates increased; and by the end of the Triassic, the central basin was filled. A shallow seaway was present throughout the Jurassic. In the Early Cretaceous, subsidence rates and clastic supply increased significantly, and basic volcanism occurred over most of the CTSE. Subsidence rate, sediment supply and volcanism decreased in the Late Cretaceous. The basin was progressively deformed in the Paleogene (Eurekan Orogeny), with local foreland deposits reaching 3 km. Seventeen oil and gas fields have been discovered on salt-cored, Eurekan anticlines. A combination of stratigraphic and structural traps, involving Triassic–Jurassic strata, has the greatest potential for future hydrocarbon discoveries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207