MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298126647 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2052019/v1

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Modulates Inflammation in Treatment-resistant Depression Patients

2022· preprint· en· W4298126647 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Lespérance, Véronique Desbeaumes-Jodoin, David Drouin, Frédéric Racicot, Jean‐Philippe Miron, Christophe Longpré-Poirier, Marie‐Pierre Fournier‐Gosselin, Paméla Thébault, Réjean Lapointe, Nathalie Arbour, Jean‐François Cailhier

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsVagus nerve stimulationMedicineInternal medicineDepression (economics)OncologyStimulationVagus nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The role of inflammation in major depression is increasingly recognized. Vagal neurostimulation (VNS) is used for the treatment of epilepsy and major medical-refractory depression. VNS has neuropsychiatric functions and systemic anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this study is to measure the clinical efficacy and assess the impact on the modulation of VNS in depressive patients. Materials and Methods Six patients with refractory depression were enrolled. Depression symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating, and anxiety symptoms with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Scale at baseline, 12 and 24 months and also at the time of post-implantation blood harvest. To assess modulation of inflammation, plasmas were harvested prospectively before implantation of VNS (baseline) and up to after four years or more of continuous therapy. 40 soluble molecules were measured in the plasma by multiplex assays. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated measures multivariate ANOVAs were performed. Results At time of latter blood harvest, reduction of the mean depression severity score was 59,9% and response rate was 87%. Anxiety levels were also greatly reduced. We observed a modulation of several cytokines and inflammatory proteins in TRD patients after more than 4 years of continuous therapy. IL-7, CXCL8, CCL2, CCL13, CCL17, CCL22, Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (Flt-1) and Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF) levels were significantly lowered, whereas levels of basic Fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were increased (p values ranging from 0.004 to 0.02). Conclusions This exploratory study is the first to focus on long term efficacy of VNS and its consequences on inflammation biomarkers. VNS was associated with a significant and sustained clinical response in patients with major refractory depression patients. Our results suggest that VNS may modulate inflammation via an increase in the blood-brain barrier integrity and a reduction in inflammatory cells recruitment. This opens the door to new pathways involved in the treatment of refractory depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchFrench-language works237,207