MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298167153 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12095

On Linear Programming for Constrained and Unconstrained Average-Cost Markov Decision Processes with Countable Action Spaces and Strictly Unbounded Costs

2019· preprint· en· W4298167153 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Huizhen Yu

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesDeepMindAlberta Machine Intelligence Institute
KeywordsMathematicsCountable setMarkov decision processAction (physics)Duality (order theory)State spaceMathematical optimizationMarkov kernelDiscrete mathematicsMarkov chainApplied mathematicsMarkov processMarkov modelVariable-order Markov modelStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the linear programming approach for constrained and unconstrained Markov decision processes (MDPs) under the long-run average cost criterion, where the class of MDPs in our study have Borel state spaces and discrete countable action spaces. Under a strict unboundedness condition on the one-stage costs and a recently introduced majorization condition on the state transition stochastic kernel, we study infinite-dimensional linear programs for the average-cost MDPs and prove the absence of a duality gap and other optimality results. Our results do not require a lower-semicontinuous MDP model. Thus, they can be applied to countable action space MDPs where the dynamics and one-stage costs are discontinuous in the state variable. Our proofs make use of the continuity property of Borel measurable functions asserted by Lusin's theorem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicRisk and Portfolio OptimizationFrench-language works237,207