Overview of Molecular Quantification of the BCR-ABL Oncogene in CML Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is considered a common blood cancers and accounts for approximately 15–20% of the total cases of leukemia. Recent studies indicated that above 95% of patients suffering of CML have been found with a distinctive Philadelphia chromosome that originates from a mutual translocation between both arms of chromosomes 9 and 22. During this mutation the translocation of the ABL gene located on chromosome 9 get transferred to the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) of chromosome 22 as an effect of a joined BCR-ABL gene. Furthermore, BCR-ABL oncogene is characteristically found in CML, causing cells to divide uncontrollably and inducing severe consequences among CML patients. In line with this, applying quantification technique of the BCR-ABL gene using molecular approaches is crucial for patient controlling, initiation of the proper treatment, measurement of response to therapy, and prediction of relapse. Of greater significance, molecular assay and monitoring of the BCR-ABL gene in CML using quantitative RT-PCR provides physicians with essential diagnostic and prognostic information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".