MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4298622987 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24695

Synthesis of 5‐ethoxymethylfurfural from glucose catalyzed by porous tetra‐component metal oxides solid acid

2022· article· en· W4298622987 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Luxin Zhang, Meng Hu, Ruijun Sun, Xing Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis for Biomass Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisMesoporous materialLewis acids and basesChemistryThermogravimetryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyInorganic chemistryOxideThermal desorption spectroscopyNuclear chemistryAdsorptionDesorptionChemical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The production of 5‐ethoxymethylfurfural (EMF) from cheap and abundant glucose feedstock has attracted a great deal of attention because of its potential applications. Herein, three porous tetra‐component metal oxide solid acid catalysts (SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐A, SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐10, SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20) containing both Brønsted and Lewis acid sites have been successfully synthesized and can efficiently catalyze the synthesis of EMF from glucose. Particularly, the SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐A, SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐10, and SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20 catalysts were prepared under the template of sodium alginate, 10% F127, and 20% F127, respectively. The prepared catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), N 2 ‐adsorption–desorption isotherm, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), thermogravimetry (TG), temperature‐programmed desorption of ammonia (NH 3 ‐TPD), and pyridine infrared spectra (Py‐FTIR). The characterization results indicated that all three catalysts have a porous structure. The pore distribution of the SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐A catalyst is mainly macroporous and mesoporous, while the SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐10 and SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20 catalysts are mainly mesoporous. The SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20 catalyst exhibited the highest catalytic performance due to its large specific surface area, desirable mesoporous structure, high total acidity (especially strong and super strong acidity), and appropriate Lewis/Brønsted acid ratio. By applying SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20, the formation of EMF from glucose was successfully catalyzed and EMF was obtained at a yield of 34.56% after 12 h at 160°C. This yield is much higher compared with most other results achieved by solid acids catalysis. In addition, the reaction parameters such as reaction temperature, reaction time, glucose amount, and catalyst dosage were shown to have a significant effect on the catalytic performance. Notably, the SO 4 2− /ZFSA‐F‐20 catalyst exhibited good reusability, as its activity did not significantly diminish after four rounds of repeated experiments and was successfully reactivated after calcination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCatalysis for Biomass ConversionFrench-language works237,207