The adsorption Properties of Surface-Modified Mesoporous Silica Materials with ß-Cylodextrin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adsorption properties of surface-modified mesoporous silica materials containing ?-cyclodextrin (CD ICS) were studied using two types of gas phase adsorbates (N2 and CH3Cl), along with a dye molecule (p-nitrophenol; PNP) in an aqueous solution. The CD ICS materials possess an ordered silica mesostructure framework that depends on the type of surfactant template and the level of loading of ?-CD. Incremental variations in the uptake of gas phase adsorbates and PNP from an aqueous solution were observed, according to the composition of CD ICS materials. For materials with similar CD loading, the surface area (SA) and pore volume doubled, as the surfactant from dodecylamine to hexadecylamine was varied. The SA of the CD ICS materials decreased by ca. 1.5-fold as the CD loading varied from 2% to 6%. The sorption capacity (Qe; mmol/g) of PNP increased from 61% to 84% as the CD loading increased from 2% to 6% and as the alkyl chain length of the surfactant template varied from C12 to C16. The adsorption properties of CD ICS materials with CH3Cl in the gas phase and for PNP in aqueous solution adopt a multi-layer adsorption profile, as described by the BET isotherm model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".