MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299438869 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1008.4768

The absence of phase transition for the classical XY-model on Sierpinski\n pyramid with fractal dimension D=2

2010· preprint· W4299438869 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Przedborski, B. Mitrović

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2010
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassical XY modelSierpinski triangleKosterlitz–Thouless transitionPhysicsSierpinski carpetPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsFractal dimensionPeriodic boundary conditionsMonte Carlo methodDimension (graph theory)FractalMathematical physicsMathematicsBoundary value problemMathematical analysisCombinatoricsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the spin models with continuous symmetry on regular lattices and finite\nrange of interactions the lower critical dimension is d=2. In two dimensions\nthe classical XY-model displays Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition\nassociated with unbinding of topological defects (vortices and antivortices).\nWe perform a Monte Carlo study of the classical XY-model on Sierpinski pyramids\nwhose fractal dimension is D=log4/log2=2 and the average coordination number\nper site is about 7. The specific heat does not depend on the system size which\nindicates the absence of long range order. From the dependence of the helicity\nmodulus on the cluster size and on boundary conditions we draw a conclusion\nthat in the thermodynamic limit there is no Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless\ntransition at any finite temperature. This conclusion is also supported by our\nresults for linear magnetic susceptibility. The lack of finite temperature\nphase transition is presumably caused by the finite order of ramification of\nSierpinski pyramid.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207