MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299614488 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.2888

Transdimensional Approximate Bayesian Computation for Inference on\n Invasive Species Models with Latent Variables of Unknown Dimension

2013· preprint· W4299614488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oksana Chkrebtii, Erin K. Cameron, David A. Campbell, Erin M. Bayne

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApproximate Bayesian computationLatent variableInferenceBayesian inferenceBayesian probabilitySampling (signal processing)ComputationDimension (graph theory)Computer scienceStatisticsMathematicsEcologyArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate information on patterns of introduction and spread of non-native\nspecies is essential for making predictions and management decisions. In many\ncases, estimating unknown rates of introduction and spread from observed data\nrequires evaluating intractable variable-dimensional integrals. In general,\ninference on the large class of models containing latent variables of large or\nvariable dimension precludes exact sampling techniques. Approximate Bayesian\ncomputation (ABC) methods provide an alternative to exact sampling but rely on\ninefficient conditional simulation of the latent variables. To accomplish this\ntask efficiently, a new transdimensional Monte Carlo sampler is developed for\napproximate Bayesian model inference and used to estimate rates of introduction\nand spread for the non-native earthworm species Dendrobaena octaedra (Savigny)\nalong roads in the boreal forest of northern Alberta. Using low and high\nestimates of introduction and spread rates, the extent of earthworm invasions\nin northeastern Alberta was simulated to project the proportion of suitable\nhabitat invaded in the year following data collection.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207