Bibliographic record
Abstract
Symposium theme: Providing Access to Information for Everyone Access to information is vital for the personal and social growth of every individual. However, many people are facing barriers in accessing information. The goal of the BOBCATSSS 2008 symposium is to explore access to information for everybody from the technical, political, legal, social and economical point of view. The symposium would like to identify the existing barriers in accessing information and to offer an overview of new concepts, ideas and examples of good practice in order to raise awareness and achieve possible solutions. Invited are contributions in a form of a paper, workshop or a poster covering the following topics: Technical aspects: • Infrastructures, standards and interoperability for universal access to information • Open access supported by open source • Digital repositories and documentserver (long term preservation and access) • Usability, service and interface design Political aspects: • Repression via information - withdrawal/censorship • Bills and laws for LIS - an international composition • Copyright aspects of open access and open source initiative • Role of national/regional/local governments in the development of information institutions Social aspects: • Digital divide • Information professionals in the information society • Information literacy (a holistic approach) • Information ethics • Information behavior of different users groups Economical aspects: • Costs of information • Costs of electronic resources • Licensing agreements • Digital library costs The target group is students. We are especially inviting workshop contributions or papers given by students or teams of students and teachers. Further information and guidelines for the abstracts can be found on the BOBCATSSS website: http://www.bobcatsss2008.org. Abstracts should be sent by 15 May 2007 to: papers@bobcatsss2008.org . BOBCATSSS 2008 will be held on January 28-30 in Zadar, Croatia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.703 | 0.578 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".