MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299790997 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1507.00596

A fast and well-conditioned spectral method for singular integral\n equations

2015· preprint· en· W4299790997 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richard Mikaël Slevinsky, Sheehan Olver

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsHelmholtz equationIntegral equationFactorizationInvertible matrixChebyshev polynomialsOperator (biology)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a spectral method for solving univariate singular integral\nequations over unions of intervals by utilizing Chebyshev and ultraspherical\npolynomials to reformulate the equations as almost-banded infinite-dimensional\nsystems. This is accomplished by utilizing low rank approximations for sparse\nrepresentations of the bivariate kernels. The resulting system can be solved in\n${\\cal O}(m^2n)$ operations using an adaptive QR factorization, where $m$ is\nthe bandwidth and $n$ is the optimal number of unknowns needed to resolve the\ntrue solution. The complexity is reduced to ${\\cal O}(m n)$ operations by\npre-caching the QR factorization when the same operator is used for multiple\nright-hand sides. Stability is proved by showing that the resulting linear\noperator can be diagonally preconditioned to be a compact perturbation of the\nidentity. Applications considered include the Faraday cage, and acoustic\nscattering for the Helmholtz and gravity Helmholtz equations, including\nspectrally accurate numerical evaluation of the far- and near-field solution.\nThe Julia software package SingularIntegralEquations.jl implements our method\nwith a convenient, user-friendly interface.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207